Yes, Windows 8 Is Bad…

I’ve been using the Windows 8 Release Preview — on and off — since it became available on May 31. The hardware I’m running it on is a Dell Latitude E6420 — i.e., a typical modern enterprise laptop, with no touchscreen.

Why have I been using Windows 8 “on and off”? Partly, it’s to avoid the buggy-ness to be expected in any pre-release software (e.g., IE 10 crashes when I try to print from it). The other part, however, is that for someone who “lives on the desktop,” the constant switching back and forth between the Metro start screen and the desktop is an annoying drag on productivity.

I’m about to install Stardock Start8, to see how well that addresses switching-to-the-Metro-start-screen issue, but this strikes me as symptomatic of a larger issue — that Microsoft really has made the desktop a second-class citizen in Windows 8 — intentionally or otherwise.

Don’t get me wrong — Windows 8 is a “must do” for Microsoft, with the potential to move them from a far-behind to a leadership position on tablet computers and devices. As I observed in my previous blog posting, “Windows 8, BYOD, and IT Leadership,” Windows 8 is the first truly enterprise-oriented tablet OS, and it deserves a high level of uptake in this role.

I will say, however, that when it comes to desktops and non-touch laptops, businesses could be well served by treating Windows 8, like Windows Vista, as a “let’s skip this one” version. (I should point out, by the way, that I was not anti-Vista, see my SmartTipWindows Vista, Windows 7, etc. Revisited.”) Let’s give Microsoft a chance to get it right on the desktop-Metro coexistence, which is just plain sub-optimal in Windows 8.

PS, while it is a “don’t care” from a productivity standpoint, I personally would love to see Microsoft reconsider the removal of transparency of window borders they’ve announced for RTM. I understand the rationale that it chews-up battery power, but as someone who runs on battery less than 5% of the time I’m on the computer, I’d really like the option to keep that bit of eye candy when plugged-in.


4 thoughts on “Yes, Windows 8 Is Bad…

  1. So I am struggling to understand your point. Is Window 8 good for the enterprise or bad for the enterprise? I do see a disconnect between the mobile style UI and the traditional productivity UI that people are so used to. On the other hand, except for hardcore document creation, the tablets are taking over in the enterprise.

    1. In the big picture, Windows 8 is “good for the enterprise” (notwithstanding my headline). It is an essential complement to the bottom-up BYOD demand for tablets in the enterprise. It is arguably the best platform for business-value-creation-driven deployment of tablet applications (which, as I noted previously, is not the same as BYOD). Given, however, that most businesses are still in the throes of migrating from Windows XP to Windows 7 at the desktop, and the awkwardness of the Windows 8 desktop experience for the vast number of information workers who work at desks (even if the computers on their desks happen to be “laptops”), there is little motivation for businesses to be thinking about Windows 8 deployment for non-tablet PCs.

We value all comments... Please leave yours here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s